Percona Resources

Software
Downloads

All of Percona’s open source software products, in one place, to download as much or as little as you need.

Product
Documentation

A single source for documentation on all of Percona’s leading, open source software.

Financial Services

Driving Database Success

Percona Blog

Percona Blog

Our popular knowledge center for all Percona products and all related topics.

Community

Percona Community Hub

A place to stay in touch with the open source community

Events

Percona Events Hub

See all of Percona’s upcoming events and view materials like webinars and forums from past events

About

About Percona

Percona is an open source database software, support, and services company that helps make databases and applications run better.

Percona in the News

See Percona’s recent news coverage, press releases and industry recognition for our open source software and support.

Our Customers

Our Partners

Careers

Contact Us

Alex Cercel, Antonios Giannopoulos, and Pedro Albuquerque presents Comparing Geospatial Implementation in MongoDB, Postgres, and Elastic.

For a considerable set of applications querying geographical data consists of a critical operation. Fast responses combined with a high level of accuracy are often the requirements when an application user interacts with functions/operations of the type “Give me near me” or “Find me in area XYZ”. Additional complexity is usually added when the points of interest are constantly on the move, like a public transportation vehicle or a taxi.

For applications that frequently access geographical data and rely on both speed and accuracy, both application and database design is crucial. In this presentation, we are going to focus on the database side. More specifically, we are going to evaluate three of the most popular open-source databases, MongoDB, Postgres, and Elastic against geospatial workloads. For each of these databases, we are going to examine the implementation and the performance of geo-queries. We are going to discuss best practices and design patterns for each database and try to find a winner among the three.

For a considerable set of applications querying geographical data consists of a critical operation. Fast responses combined with a high level of accuracy are often the requirements when an application user interacts with functions/operations of the type “Give me near me” or “Find me in area XYZ”. Additional complexity is usually added when the points of interest are constantly on the move, like a public transportation vehicle or a taxi.

For applications that frequently access geographical data and rely on both speed and accuracy, both application and database design is crucial. In this presentation, we are going to focus on the database side. More specifically, we are going to evaluate three of the most popular open-source databases, MongoDB, Postgres, and Elastic against geospatial workloads. For each of these databases, we are going to examine the implementation and the performance of geo-queries. We are going to discuss best practices and design patterns for each database and try to find a winner among the three.