Comments on: Leveraging ProxySQL with AWS Aurora to Improve Performance https://www.percona.com/blog/leveraging-proxysql-with-aws-aurora-for-performance/ Tue, 16 May 2023 16:34:11 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 By: Ivan https://www.percona.com/blog/leveraging-proxysql-with-aws-aurora-for-performance/#comment-10969521 Thu, 02 Aug 2018 12:45:32 +0000 https://www.percona.com/blog/?p=49122#comment-10969521 I am curious about the spikes in Latency reported in ProxySQL write only test. Did you ever find out what happened there?

]]> By: Rod https://www.percona.com/blog/leveraging-proxysql-with-aws-aurora-for-performance/#comment-10969445 Fri, 20 Jul 2018 19:08:00 +0000 https://www.percona.com/blog/?p=49122#comment-10969445 Excellent information and findings… I appreciate you sharing this and will certainly consider Percona in the future for DB related support. Thanks again Marco !

]]> By: Marco Tusa https://www.percona.com/blog/leveraging-proxysql-with-aws-aurora-for-performance/#comment-10969095 Sat, 14 Apr 2018 13:32:06 +0000 https://www.percona.com/blog/?p=49122#comment-10969095 In reply to Abbas Ahmed.

QC in ProxySQL was disable during the tests.

]]> By: Abbas Ahmed https://www.percona.com/blog/leveraging-proxysql-with-aws-aurora-for-performance/#comment-10969094 Fri, 13 Apr 2018 22:09:32 +0000 https://www.percona.com/blog/?p=49122#comment-10969094 Marco, I was wondering if you measured the cache hit ratio on ProxySQL?

]]> By: Marco Tusa https://www.percona.com/blog/leveraging-proxysql-with-aws-aurora-for-performance/#comment-10969054 Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:21:06 +0000 https://www.percona.com/blog/?p=49122#comment-10969054 In reply to jonathan.

Jonathan, tks for reading.
May you please elaborate how the difference can be related to java apps?
Keep in mind the same tests had run using proxysql and Aurora cluster endpoint.
Not only but I had some behaviour also using sysbench (also reported above), so I want to be sure I had not miss an important aspect, like you are suggesting in the comment.

thanks

]]> By: jonathan https://www.percona.com/blog/leveraging-proxysql-with-aws-aurora-for-performance/#comment-10969049 Tue, 03 Apr 2018 21:43:40 +0000 https://www.percona.com/blog/?p=49122#comment-10969049 This is probably something that causes an overhead on the Java side. Still, very good solution from ProxySQL.

]]> By: Abbas Ahmed https://www.percona.com/blog/leveraging-proxysql-with-aws-aurora-for-performance/#comment-10969048 Tue, 03 Apr 2018 19:57:18 +0000 https://www.percona.com/blog/?p=49122#comment-10969048 Just as I expected the results to be, ProxySQL rocks!
Thanks very much for the great write up Marco. This is awesome stuff.

]]>