Comments on: Streamlined Percona XtraDB Cluster (or anything) testing with Consul and Vagrant https://www.percona.com/blog/streamlined-pxc-anything-testing-consul-vagrant/ Wed, 07 Aug 2019 13:35:31 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 By: epcim https://www.percona.com/blog/streamlined-pxc-anything-testing-consul-vagrant/#comment-10965770 Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:51:37 +0000 https://www.percona.com/blog/?p=27197#comment-10965770 Thanks!

]]> By: Jay Janssen https://www.percona.com/blog/streamlined-pxc-anything-testing-consul-vagrant/#comment-10965766 Fri, 08 Jan 2016 13:02:30 +0000 https://www.percona.com/blog/?p=27197#comment-10965766 Hi epcim — wsrep_cluster_address does not demand every active cluster node be listed. It is used only when the local node is starting and it only needs to find ONE active node in the cluster. pxc.service.consul only needs to give a single ip of another active node for the local node to successfully join.

]]> By: epcim https://www.percona.com/blog/streamlined-pxc-anything-testing-consul-vagrant/#comment-10965765 Fri, 08 Jan 2016 09:09:02 +0000 https://www.percona.com/blog/?p=27197#comment-10965765 Hi, I am about to use percona + consul for production. I am about to avoid consul-template since I already use chef for configuration.

Can you please confirm that usage of 'wsrep_cluster_address' => 'gcomm://pxc.service.consul', will result in using/specifying of “all” the hosts registered in ‘pxc’ service defined on consul? Like one..N IP addresses? It ovbiously depends on what percona does with “gcomm://” handler.

Thanks PMi

]]>